Every single voting machine used in this year’s election should be prosecuted and checked for forensic examination, according to attorney Sidney Powell, who argues that there is more than enough criminal probable cause to warrant such a move.

Powell, who has filed a variety of election-related cases in several states, said President Donald Trump might use his 2018 executive order on foreign interference that would give him certain authority.

“That gives him all kinds of power—to do everything from seizing assets, to freeze things, demand the impoundment of the machines,” she told The Epoch Times’ “American Thought Leaders” program. “Under the emergency powers, he could even appoint a special prosecutor to look into this, which is exactly what needs to happen.”

“Every voting machine in the country should be impounded right now,” Powell said.

In a bid to decertify the 2020 election results, she also lodged an emergency request to the Supreme Court to prevent electors from casting their votes in four states.

According to the 2018 executive order, the director of national intelligence would be tasked with conducting “an assessment of any information indicating that a foreign government, or any person acting as an agent of or on behalf of a foreign government, has acted with the intent or purpose of interfering in that election,” no later than 45 days after the election.

Sanctions against those identified as foreign actors who interfere with the election may also be recommended in accordance with the order.

Perhaps the most troubling machine fraud found so far is that carried out through Dominion Voting Systems, said Powell. On Dec. 14, a forensic audit of Dominion machines and software in Michigan showed that machines were designed to create fraud and influence election results, the data firm stated in a preliminary report.

“We conclude that the Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results,” Russell Ramsland Jr., co-founder of Allied Security Operations Group, said in the report.

“The system intentionally generates an enormously high number of ballot errors. The electronic ballots are then transferred for adjudication,” he added. “The intentional errors lead to bulk adjudication of ballots with no oversight, no transparency, and no audit trail.”

Allied Security Operations and Ramsland, a former NASA official and Reagan administration official, said they found that the ballot-adjudication logs and security logs for the Nov. 3 general election had been removed from the Dominion Voting Systems machines in Antrim County. They said the logs of the previous elections were still there before Nov. 3.

On Dec. 14, a Michigan judge allowed the parties to release the results of the forensic imaging review of Dominion, with the drafting of the code. The 23-page report was published shortly thereafter by the Allied Security Operations Group.

In a Dec. 15 statement, Dominion refuted the report’s findings, saying there were “no software ‘glitches’ that ‘switched’ votes in Antrim County or anywhere else.” Dominion said the errors they identified in Antrim County “were isolated human errors not involving Dominion.”

On machine fraud, Powell said the alleged illegal activity included “everything from injecting massive quantities of votes into the system that they just made up, to running counterfeit ballots through multiple times in multiple batches to create the appearance of votes that weren’t really there.”

According to its official website, the company’s voting technology is currently used in 28 U.S. states and Puerto Rico. Powell said that a forensic audit needs to be carried out on every Dominion machine in the country, but Dominion’s scrutiny should not end.

Powell listed one of her witnesses during her interview, an alleged informant who has a history with the Venezuelan military, including the Venezuelan president’s National Security Guard detail. According to an affidavit, the whistleblower outlined an alleged conspiracy between Smartmatic software executives, former Venezuelan dictator Hugo Chavez, and election officials from that country to ensure that Chavez won reelection and retained power for years.

The whistleblower claimed the “software and fundamental design of the electronic electoral system and software of Dominion and other election tabulating companies relies upon software that is a descendant of the Smartmatic Electoral Management System.”

“In short, the Smartmatic software is in the DNA of every vote-tabulating company’s software and system,” the whistleblower said, according to the affidavit.