FDA hearing: Data shows COVID vaccine are dangerous and may kill more than save

FDA advisory panel declined to endorse authorization the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid booster shot for people aged 16 or older.

Dr. Joseph Fraiman, MD told the FDA on Friday that government does not have data to show the vaccine was more beneficial than it is harmful for teenage boys.

An FDA advisory panel declined to authorize Covid boost­er shot of the Pfiz­er-BioN­Tech for people aged 16 and up on September 17.

The panel voted 16–2 to reject extra doses of an experimental vaccine, citing insufficient data from incomplete clinical trials as well as the potential risk of heart inflammation – particularly among young men.

The hearing was 8 hours long and it included stunning testimony from American doctors, according to The Gateway Pundit.

No data to show the vaccine was beneficial

Dr Joseph Fraiman, an emergency medicine physician in New Orleans, spoke for several minutes during the meeting and revealed that no clinical evidence exists to disprove claims that the Covid-19 vaccines are harming more people than they save.

“We need your help on the front lines, to stop vaccine hesitancy. Demand the booster trials are large enough to find a reduction in hospitalisations.

“Without this data we the medical establishment cannot confidently call out anti-Covid-vaccine activists who publicly claim the vaccines harm more than they save, especially in the young and healthy.

“The fact we do not have the clinical evidence to say these activists are wrong should terrify us all”.

Dr. Fraiman told the FDA panel he has NOT seen that those who show vaccine hesitancy are uninformed.

“That is not what I’ve seen… The vaccine hesitant I’ve met in the ER are more aware of the vaccine studies and more aware of their own COVID risks than the doctors do. For example, many of my nurses refuse the COVID vaccine despite seeing more COVID deaths and devastation than most people have.”

Dr. Fraiman went on to say that he can’t guarantee that vaccinating a 30-year-old nurse assistant is safer than catching the virus for a healthy woman her age.

COVID vaccine may kill more than it save?

The Executive Director of the COVID-19 Early Treatment Fund, Steve Kirsch, was the next witness to appear before the FDA. Vaccines, according to Kirsch, kill more people than they save.

“I’m going to focus my remarks today on the elephant in the room that nobody likes to talk about, that the vaccines kill more than they save.

According to Kirsh, patients who received the vaccine were 71 times more likely to have a heart attack than those who received other vaccines. The drug caused 20 deaths, while the placebo caused 14 deaths.

“We were led to believe that the vaccines were perfectly safe but this is simply not true, for example there are four times as many heart attacks in the treatment group in the Pfizer 6 month file report, that wasn’t just bad luck.VAERS shows heart attacks happen 71 times more often following these vaccines compared to any other vaccine,” he said.

According to Kirsh, the vaccine killed more people than it saved.

Steve Kirsch then continued his presentation by showing a slide titled ‘Excess Death: Life ratio is UNACCEPTABLE’. The slide shows how many excess deaths were required following vaccination to save one life due to Covid-19.

Steve Kirsch showed a slide titled ‘Excess Death: Life ratio is UNACCEPTABLE’.
Steve Kirsch showed a slide titled ‘Excess Death: Life ratio is UNACCEPTABLE’.

“Only the VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) are statistically significant, but the other numbers are troubling.” said Steve Kirsch.

“Even if the vaccines have 100% protection, it still means we kill 2 people to save 1 life.

“Four experts did analysis using completely different non US data sources and all of them came up with approximately the same number of excess vaccine related deaths, about 411 deaths per million doses. That translates into 115,000 people have died (due to the Covid-19 vaccines).”

Steve Kirsch also mentioned that early treatments are more effective than boosters. He pointed out that cases in Israel are at an all-time high, while cases in Uttar Pradesh, India, where Ivermectin is administered, are nearly non-existent today.

“The real numbers confirm that we kill more than we save. And I would love to look at the Israel ministry of health data on the 90+ year olds where we went from a 94.4% vaccinated group to 82.9% vaccinated in the last 4 months. In the most optimistic it means that 50% of the vaccinated people died and 0% of unvaccinated people died. Unless you can explain that to the public you cannot approve the boosters.”

Peter Marks, FDA’s top vaccine regulator, then asked committee members to examine “the totality of the evidence in order to make your recommendation for us,”.

Watch:

4 responses to “FDA hearing: Data shows COVID vaccine are dangerous and may kill more than save”

  1. And people are reading. Some are afraid to “hit” the star because they think they’re being watched. Of course, we all are, but why stop freedom of speech and opinion?

    Like

  2. Keep writing. We’ve discovered articles sharing that the highest incidences of the virus are the states with the highest vaccinated people, percentage wise. And remember: it’s an MRNA vaccine, something never before used population-wide, and politically motivated to the nth degree.

    Like

  3. FDA Approved the Pfizer vaccine and these doctors say it kills people?

    Like

    1. Google wants to censor my answer, apparently. THIRD TRY HERE:
      Americans have grown accustomed to federal agencies whose purpose is ostensibly to look out for our best interests, but them days is GONE! Money talks, and trumps ethics and honesty EVERY TIME. These clowns give the oldest profession a bad name!
      In addition to all the egredious errors in this forced quax program, they are working diligently to REMOVE things from the market here in the US that actually ARE both safe AND effective against the kung flu. Lots of doctors elsewhere have found GREAT success with things that are cheap, available (even in 3rd world countries) and have been used by MILLIONS of people for DECADES. Why, you ask?
      Because under the guidelines of the federal EUA program, the ONLY WAY that new, experimental drugs can get this shortcut deal is IF THERE EXISTS NO OTHER WORKING MED or protocol. So since they clearly DO exist, to even acknowledge that fact renders their money-grubbing scams INVALID!

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: