The Supreme Court on March 1 formally rejected two of Sidney Powell’s lawsuits that challenged the results of the Nov. 3 election.

The Supreme Court didn’t offer any comment about dismissing the lawsuits. One lawsuit was filed in Wisconsin and the other in Arizona.

The court made the announcement on Monday morning. Justices Alito, Gorsuch, and Thomas dissented from the denial.

In response to that ruling, Attorney Sidney Powell had a comment on Telegram:

“The Supreme Court’s failure to date to address the massive election fraud and multiple constitutional violations that  wrought a coup of the presidency of the greatest country in world history completes the implosion of each of our three branches of government into the rubble of a sinkhole of corruption. 
It is an absolute tragedy for the Rule of Law, the future of what was a Republic, and all freedom-loving people around the world.” 

Earlier, on February 26, Sidney Powell and Retired General Michael Flynn joined Erskine radio for the weekly podcast. Regarding the election 2020, Sidney Powell had this to say:

“There’s all kind of precedent for fixing what happened in this election from Bush vs. Gore to other cases as well… Fractionalized votes. That’s exactly what we have here from a computer algorithm that we can prove in multiple counties and it could prove across the country if anybody would issue an order allowing inspection of the machines. The very fact that Dominion and other companies are not allowing inspection of the voting machines ought to tell everybody all they need to know. Federal law calls for election records to be kept for 22 months… In this case it requires forensic evaluations of the machines and looking at all of the paper ballots. We already know that’s not going to match up. There were counterfeit ballots. People were saying, “Oh, well they did a full audit in Georgia.” Well, if you just keep running the same counterfeit bill through the same counting machine you’re going to get the same result.”

Sidney then asserted: “There is enough evidence in the cases before them or enough evidence in the public now to more than reverse the election in at least five states.”

More stories: